Latest From Our Blog

The Best Thoroughbred Horse Trainers

Every legendary racehorse started out as a young colt that did not even know how to break correctly. Some legends, such as Secretariat, didn’t even win their maiden. Basically, every great student first had to have a great teacher, and there is no better teacher than thoroughbred trainers. We all know who the best ones are, but do many of us know why they are the best? I want to share with you some of my favorite trainers and why they have had success with three year olds.

If I told you that a horse you owned just worked 5 furlongs in 59 flat would you be thrilled? You shouldn’t be thrilled. You really shouldn’t be anything because it’s all dependent on what’s normal for your horse. Is he a speedy miler type? If he is, then 59 flat isn’t that tough on him. If he is a cheap claimer, then he probably left his best effort on the training track. The point is that it honestly depends on the horse. Cannanero II was a brilliant racehorse who worked unbelievably slow. When journalists and fellow horseman would ask Juan Arias what he thought of the workouts he would reply “perfecto!” He did this because with Cannanero II less was more. Think of a really good prizefighter like Mayweather or Manny Pacquiao. Given each guys advanced age and incredibly high skill level, don’t you think that they can afford to take a few hours off here and there? I would argue that it would be incredibly beneficial. The same goes for horses like Cannanero II.

When I see horses working in company, I get excited. Seeing how a horse responds to competition is a sure sign of where he is mentally. Look at the way Shared Belief and Bayern work in company. They love the thrill of competition. Take a look at the way they position their head and let their ears flap. They have a quiet determination to them. At the 2007 Kentucky Derby, every single horseman said that two horses were working lights out: Street Sense and Curlin. If I remember correctly, Street Sense dominated and Curlin came in third. This shows that how horses come into a race is incredibly important. When betting the Derby this year, I am going to look at the horses with the top 4 TA indicators and pick the one who’s last major work at Churchill Downs was the most professional. Again, I will pick the one who’s work is the most professional not the fastest.

Home field advantage means a lot. I like when Derby horses have been based in the state of Kentucky for over a month. Churchill and Keenland are great tracks to train for route races on. It also helps because honestly, most horses hate to ship in for a race. They really are like human three year olds. I loved how Fusaichi Pegasus and Street Sense came into the Derby. Nafzger and Drysdale made sure that their horses grew to love Churchill Downs so that they would have one less obstacle to overcome.

If you are going to play a recent shipper (Horses arriving within 14 days of the Derby) make sure that it’s a horse who’s trainer has attempted this before. It also helps if the horse is a more relaxed type like a Zenyatta or a Street Sense. These types of horse refuse to leave their best effort on the training track.

Remember, it is time to start viewing the derby horses that you are interested in through the lens of how they workout. A good horse cannot achieve greatness without a great trainer.

 

http://www.thoroughbredanalytics.com/

 

The Derby Futures Pool is in Full Swing

My Kentucky Derby Top 10

There are far too many Derby top 10 lists, but with the futures pool in full swing I thought I would give you guys some insight into who I like and who I would stay away from. The Derby futures pool is a good way to make money, but only if you can stay away from the hype.

10. Bayern: The fact that this horse has ran off the screen is impressive, but what is really impressive is how he does it. He runs his final quarter of a mile around 24 flat. He usually has plenty left in the tank and should get the distance.

9. Cairo Prince: When I was a teenager, I made the mistake of playing Favorite Trick in my Derby exacta. This horse could be Favorite Trick’s long lost brother. If my memory serves me correctly, the derby wasn’t too kind to Favorite Trick and probably won’t be to Cairo Prince either.

8. Intense Holiday: Vicar’s in Trouble is a legitimately good racehorse, so anyone who makes him look like an allowance horse at Golden Gate fields has my respect. Intense Holiday has my respect.

7. Top Billing: Some make too much out of the track bias while other make too little. The way I see it, the leaders ran the first ¾ in 1:10 but it felt like 1:11. This means that Top Billing closed into an honest pace and ran a decent race. He is a derby contender, but there are more impressive horses out there.

6. Mexicoma: I am going to catch a lot of flak for this one. I know that Mexicoma ran a very similar race to Top Billing’s last time out. I also know that it was at the same track and against slightly less intimidating company. The reason I have Mexicoma so high is because he wants a mile and a quarter; he craves the distance. The run for the roses is occasionally won by talent deficient horses who crave distance and at least Mexicoma fits that profile. In short, he has more upside than Top Billing at this point.

5.  Shared Belief: I am a huge fan of Hollendorfer’s methods and I like that this horse brings regular people to the track. So yeah, I gave him the five spot.

4. Honor Code: Honor Code seems to be working well and the injury may have been a blessing in disguise as he will have two preps and be fresh for the derby. I like how this horse just chips away at the leaders and has that deep closing style that seems to work well at Churchill Downs, but we won’t know how hot he is until he runs in the Rebel.

3. Candy Boy: He used to be known as the horse who got his butt kicked against Shared Belief until he started doing some but kicking of his own. This is the best horse in the west right now and is only getting better. I seriously considered putting him at number one, but I’m not sure if he beat great horses or glorified allowance horses in the Bob Lewis.

2. Strong Mandate: We know he has the talent. He took the scenic route in the Southwest Stakes and still finished second to Tapiture. My worry with this horse is that he likes to get in trouble and doesn’t have the acceleration to get out of it. He is the type of horse that needs a hall of fame ride in order to win the derby.

1. Tapiture: I honestly believe that we just saw the two three year olds in training run against one another in the Southwest Stakes. Unlike Strong Mandate, Tapiture saved ground and he rated brilliantly! He listened to his jockey’s cue and was full of run coming down the stretch, which leads me to believe he can get the distance.

Next week will be the start of a three part series on the training regimen of a derby champion.

www.thoroughbredanalytics.com

Stop Undervaluing Broodmares in a Horse’s Pedigree

When Rags to Riches won the Belmont Stakes it marked the first time a brother-sister duo both captured a jewel of the Triple Crown.  Besides the fact that the odds of one mare throwing two Belmont Stakes winners is about the same as the odds of winning Powerball, the event underscored the importance of the female line when it comes to winning a leg of the triple crown.

There’s a tendency in racing to let data dictate the discussion rather than the other way around. This is the primary reason sires have been overvalued in pedigree analysis and broodmares have been undervalued. The dosage index, which I have commented on in an earlier piece, classifies only the male members in a horse’s pedigree. The problem with this is that stamina tends to run along the tail female line. This means that going forward it is important to research the female families of the derby contenders, but we must first understand how to properly do this.

Luckily for us all, bloodlines.net has some great diagrams on all of the female families. I looked through them and identified seven exceptional families whose descendants have had success in classics time and time again. This doesn’t mean that their descendants are a lock to win this year’s Kentucky Derby, it just means that you should pay closer attention to the Derby contenders who descend from these families. I have listed the family number, the famous descendants and a rating from one to ten, with ten being the highest, on how relevant I believe the family currently is.

Family Number

Famous Descendants

Relevancy

2S

Secretariat, Alleged

5

3L

A.P. Indy, Silver Charm, Summer Squall, Lemon Drop Kid

8

1X

Go for Gin, Super Saver , Smarty Jones, Sea Hero, Easy Goer, Prairie Bayou

10

8F

Jazil, Rags to Riches, Redoute’s Choice

10

16H

Barbaro, Red Bullet

7

22B

Street Sense, She’s Country

7

5H

Big Brown, Redoute’s Dancer

9

With the gap between the great families and the less than great families getting wider each year, it will be interesting to see how this angle plays out in this year’s derby. I will not get into the descendants of these seven families as yet because it is too early, but I hope to discuss this angle in depth as the derby approaches.

Do Horses Know They Won or Lost a Race?

I remember having a beer with my friends and watching the 2011 Kentucky Derby when one of my friends asked me if horses know if they won or lost. Now, most of you probably know the answer to that question, but some still do not. What is even more frightening is that some people who go to the track every single day do not know that there is a mental aspect to horse racing.

The great Carl Nafzger always compared his horses to football players, and like most things he said there was a subtle brilliance to this seemingly simple analogy. Football players – especially wideouts and slot recievers will mainly succeed based on their physical capabilities; however, there is the task of keeping your eye trained on catching a football when you know that a lineman is coming after you. The second task is primarily mental and separates the good ones from the great ones. It is a secondary talent much like a horse’s willingness to fight inside the eight pole, but is necessary in order to accomplish greatness.

To play with Mr. Nafzger’s analogy a little bit more, a receiver who shuns violence has a limited amount of routes that they can successfully run; likewise a horse who hates getting bumped and fighting inside the eighth pole has only one path to victory. He basically needs a clean break and as to try and lead the field, take a breather at the three-eighths pole and run like lightning down the stretch in order to effectively end the race before he gets to the eighth pole. This is a very specific scenario if you ask me.

Two horses who epitomize the scared wide receiver are Verrazano and Normandy Invasion. These are probably the second and third most talented horses in training right now, but they hate contact-they hate a dogfight.

Verrazano is lucky to have Johnny V as his jockey. The man is an excellent judge of pace and always seems to find a hole when his horse needs running room. Unfortunately for Johnny V. he hasn’t had much success with Verrazano because the horse must be on the lead regardless of how suicidal the fractions may be. This is why Verrazano has such a spotty record and will probably continue to struggle.  After all, you don’t see too many horses winning wire to wire on turf tracks in Europe.

Normandy Invasion embodies the herd mentality. Where most horses get brave on the lead he wilts. Take a look at last year’s Kentucky Derby. Most horses with the lead at the top of the stretch in the most electrifying moment in sports would have at least held on the to lead for another 200 yards. I really think that a win bet on Normandy Invasion is basically a donation without the tax benefits. The shame is if he develops that killer instinct the rest of the handicap division will be in huge trouble.

On the flipside of all of this is Zenyatta. Here is a horse who won nineteen race and lost one – and that was by half a nose! The thing is, in nine of those races she started her run too late and really should have lost, but her fighting spirit carried her to victory. Being a descendant of Street Cry, she exhibits extreme alpha tendencies, which helped her defeat every horse she has ever raced against, except Blame.

Now, I don’t want you to start anthropomorphizing these animals to the point where you become the guy on Horseplayers who was “hanging out” with Goldenscents. However, I do want you to acknowledge that the sport of kings is a mentally taxing endeavor and adjust your handicapping accordingly.

The Dosage Index; An Effective Handicapping Tool?

I’ve always thought that the dosage index was a pretty underrated tool for handicapping a derby horse, but when Bruno de Julio started singing its praises I began to pay even more attention to the dosage index. The following is a highly unscientific study. In order to meet the standards of a scientific study, I would’ve have had to take on the type of research that takes at least 6 months to complete.

For those who do not know, the dosage index is a numerical point system that categorizes a horse’s male ancestors. I won’t get into the specifics, but basically there are 5 categories: Brilliant, Intermediate, Classic, Solid and Professional. In order to even be included on the list, a sire had to have excelled at the highest levels of racing, but the distances he excelled at are what make the difference. If he excelled at 6 furlongs he was “brilliant.” If he excelled at 14 furlongs he was considered “professional.” If he truly demonstrated the ideal combination of speed and stamina he was considered “classic.”

For quite some time people have looked at the ratio of the points in the first two categories and the classic category and divided them by the last two categories and the classic category. This is the wrong way to read dosage indexes. Take a look at the chart below and tell me if you notice a pattern.

Horse

Brilliant

Intermediate

Classic

Solid

Professional

Monarchos

2

2

13

1

0

Animal Kingdom

2

0

6

0

0

I’ll Have Another

2

4

7

1

0

Silver Charm

3

5

17

5

0

Street Sense

8

1

12

0

1

Horse

Brilliant

Intermediate

Classic

Solid

Professional

Secret Circle

7

10

9

2

2

Trinniberg

3

0

3

0

0

Private Zone

3

0

3

0

0

Fast Bullet

6

7

11

0

0

Sum of the Parts

6

5

9

0

0

The first five horses delivered-in my opinion- the best Kentucky Derby performances of the modern era. The bottom chart shows five horses that were talented enough to compete in the Breeder’s Cup Sprint, but with the exception of Secret Circle, could not stay 6 furlongs on a speed-favoring track.

Throughout history, we have looked at the dosage index in terms of ratio’s. We took the points on the left in relation to the points on the right. Well, what if we looked at the dosage index as a weighted point system? What if we multiplied the numbers in the Brilliant and Intermediate categories by one, the number in the Classic category by two and the numbers in the Solid and Professional Categories by four then added all five values together?

Horse Brilliant Intermediate Classic Solid Professional
Monarchos

2

2

26

4

0

Animal Kingdom

2

0

12

0

0

I’ll Have Another

2

4

14

4

0

Silver Charm

3

5

34

20

0

Street Sense

8

1

24

0

4

Horse Brilliant Intermediate Classic Solid Professional
Secret Circle

7

10

18

8

8

Trinniberg

3

0

6

0

0

Private Zone

3

0

6

0

0

Fast Bullet

6

7

22

0

0

Sum of the Parts

6

5

18

0

0

Does this new chart show that the dosage points are the be-all end-all of everything? Absolutely not. What this chart does show is that a weighted point system gives a fairly accurate representation of the potential of each horse. This system shows that the dosage system had the right idea with the wrong execution. For the statistics geeks out there, I would imagine the correlation between a horse’s dosage index and his ability to get ten furlongs to be .1 or so. I would imagine the correlation between a horses dosage points on my weighted points system and its ability to get ten furlongs to be .6 or so; maybe not the greatest handicapping tool ever created, but a great tool to add to the arsenal. For our next test, we will look at the 2007 Kentucky Derby. I did not choose this race for any other reason other than I am a huge fan of Street Sense. If you want to apply my weighted point system to another Kentucky Derby feel free.

Horse Brilliant Intermediate Classic Solid Professional
Street Sense

8

1

12

0

1

Hard Spun

9

11

24

0

0

Curlin

9

11

17

0

1

Imawildandcrazyguy

5

5

4

0

0

Circular Quay

6

2

11

1

0

Tiago

3

12

12

2

3

Any Given Saturday

7

8

14

0

1

Sam P.

5

2

14

1

0

No biz like Showbiz

4

3

12

2

1

Dominican

6

6

8

0

0

Zanjero

8

6

12

0

0

Great Hunter

7

8

15

0

0

Liquidity

5

1

14

0

0

Bwana Bull

9

3

10

0

0

Storm in May

9

6

11

0

0

Tefleusberg

7

1

9

1

0

Stormello

13

5

12

0

0

Scat Daddy

10

3

11

2

0

Cowtown Cat

6

3

8

0

1

These are the un-weighted points. When weighing the categories appropriately, Hard Spun and Tiago dominate the field. Now, we didn’t get our derby winner did we? The point of all of this was not necessarily to get a Derby winner but rather to have an educated guess on which horses to throw out and which horses to pay attention to.

The biggest part of handicapping races is knowing when to bet against the favorite, and a poor distance pedigree is a huge red flag. In the next couple of blog posts we will be focusing on the Triple Crown trail and figuring out how to play the next round of the Kentucky Derby future book. You have been warned!